Skip to main content
INSTITUTIONAL ENGAGEMENT

Four ways to engage. All institutional.

AEREDIUM is built for institutions. Not retail with an institutional skin, not consortium chains for a single bank — a public, EVM-compatible chain whose architecture is designed from the ground up around the properties traditional finance actually needs: confidentiality, regulator-defensibility, operator-neutrality, structural defence against the AI-era threat surface.

LISTEN · PODCAST · 9:25
The institutional engagement model.
Chris & Nicole · 0:00 / 9:25
PODCAST

Engagement is tiered. A fund's first transaction looks different from a bank's full integration. Both are real engagement; both deliver real value. This page is the map of the four levels, what each commits to, and what each gets back.

THE ENGAGEMENT MODEL · v3.7 §5

From transacting to operating. Pick your level.

An institution's relationship with AEREDIUM scales with what it wants to do. A hedge fund settling a position is a Participant. A custodian running validators contributes to consensus. A bank routing payments through DACA is an AERLink Integrator. The four levels are not "tiers of access" — they are distinct architectural roles, each with different commitments and capabilities.

LEVEL 01
Participant
Use the chain
What it commits
A wallet, a counterparty relationship, optional auditor key. No infrastructure operation. No node hosting.
What it delivers
Direct settlement on AEREDIUM at sub-second finality. Privacy by default — amounts and counterparties visible only to authorised readers. Selective disclosure to auditors and regulators with cryptographic capabilities.
Who this is for
Hedge funds, family offices, trading desks, market makers, asset managers transacting on the chain without operating infrastructure.
ONBOARDING · 2–4 WEEKS
LEVEL 02
Operator
Run infrastructure
What it commits
Operate one or more services adjacent to the chain — RPC endpoints, indexers, analytics infrastructure, custody integrations, light-client services for downstream customers.
What it delivers
A direct view of chain state for the institution and its clients. Programmable monitoring, custom reporting, and the ability to offer AEREDIUM-backed services to a downstream institutional book.
Who this is for
Custodians, prime brokers, infrastructure providers, fund administrators who serve institutional clients and want native AEREDIUM support.
DEPLOYMENT · 6–12 WEEKS
LEVEL 03
Validator
Sign blocks
What it commits
Operate a validator instance inside an attested enclave (AWS Nitro, Azure SEV-SNP, GCP Confidential Space). Validator identity is the hash of the canonical binary — no human signs blocks, ever.
What it delivers
Direct participation in consensus on a chain designed to be defensibly neutral. Validator role is reputational and structural; it is not a yield product and is not stake-weighted.
Who this is for
Banks, regulated custodians, public institutions, infrastructure operators with verifiable operational maturity — the small set of organisations that the broader market trusts to run global infrastructure.
CERTIFICATION · 12–24 WEEKS
LEVEL 04 · FEATURED
AERLink Integrator
Bridge the bank to the chain
What it commits
Expose bank-rail capability through AERLink. The bank's existing API stays unchanged; AEREDIUM's DACA enclave holds the credentials and is invoked only by consensus events.
What it delivers
The bank becomes a composable rail in on-chain transactions. Payments, FX, securities settlement, treasury operations executable as atomic legs of multi-step AEREDIUM transactions. USPTO 09857-P0001A.
Who this is for
Commercial banks, payment networks, FX dealers, settlement infrastructure operators. The institutions whose rails the on-chain economy needs to compose with traditional finance.
INTEGRATION · 16–36 WEEKS
VS. THE ALTERNATIVES

Why institutions choose AEREDIUM over the other three options.

An institution evaluating digital-asset infrastructure typically considers three alternatives: a major exchange's institutional product, a custodian-mediated workflow, or building directly on Ethereum or another public chain. Each has real strengths. AEREDIUM differs in specific ways that matter to specific buyers.

Property
Exchange institutional
Custodian-mediated
AEREDIUM
Counterparty risk
Exchange holds assets between trade and settlement
Custodian holds — strong regulation, single point
None — threshold-signed settlement, no custodian step
Privacy of transaction data
Private to exchange; not to the public; exchange sees everything
Private to custodian; custodian sees everything
Encrypted at protocol; selective disclosure to authorised parties only
Bank-rail integration
Wire-based settlement, manual reconciliation, no atomicity
Custodian provides; not composable into on-chain logic
AERLink — bank API is an atomic leg of on-chain transactions
Regulatory defensibility
Exchange-level compliance; depends on jurisdiction
Strong — regulated custodian provides legal clarity
Selective disclosure built in; auditor and regulator capabilities
Settlement finality
T+1 to T+2 for fiat legs; instant for crypto
Custodian-mediated; depends on internal processes
Sub-second on-chain; Bitcoin-anchored for additional finality
Cross-chain risk
Bridges between chains use external verifier sets ($1B+ stolen 2026)
Custodian handles cross-chain internally; opaque
Trans Layer signs cross-chain ops with the same threshold as blocks
Operator neutrality
Single commercial operator; conflicts of interest possible
Custodian is sole counterparty for institution's assets
No single operator can sign a block — distributed TEE-attested consensus
REPRESENTATIVE USE CASES

What institutions actually do on AEREDIUM.

Drawn from real institutional patterns. None of these require AEREDIUM to operate; all of them are easier or structurally different on AEREDIUM than on the alternatives.

Cross-border corporate treasury
MULTINATIONAL · CORPORATE

A multinational consolidates intra-company liquidity across 30+ banking relationships in 15 jurisdictions. Today: manual reconciliation, cut-off times, weekend lag, FX uncertainty.

On AEREDIUM: the corporate operates as Participant; AERLink integrates with the company's existing primary banks. Internal transfers settle atomically against the bank rails; FX legs execute as part of the same transaction; treasury reporting reads off the chain in real time.

USES: AERLink · Privacy Mode · Trans Layer
Fund administration with selective auditor disclosure
HEDGE FUND · ASSET MANAGER

A fund executes positions on AEREDIUM with full counterparty privacy — competitors and the public cannot read which assets the fund holds or trades.

The fund's auditor holds a cryptographic capability that grants read access to specific transaction sets — not bulk access to the chain — sufficient to perform NAV verification, position reconciliation, and audit attestation without seeing other funds' activity. The regulator holds a separate, narrower capability.

USES: Privacy Mode · AEREDIUM Audit
Market-maker settlement across venues
MARKET MAKER · LIQUIDITY

A market maker quotes on five centralised venues and two DEXs across three chains. Today: capital fragmented across exchanges, bridge risk between chains, settlement delays compress effective leverage.

On AEREDIUM: hot inventory parks on AEREDIUM; cross-venue settlement uses the Trans Layer (no bridge); inter-chain operations sign with the same threshold that signs blocks. Effective capital efficiency improves because settlement is sub-second and bridge-free.

USES: Trans Layer · AERKey · Privacy Mode
Programmable corporate payouts
CORPORATE · PAYROLL

A company with global contractors and employees needs to disburse to local bank accounts in 40 currencies, conditional on milestone completion, with full auditability for tax and compliance.

On AEREDIUM: each payment is a smart contract whose conditional logic runs in EVM; the final settlement leg is an AERLink call into local banking infrastructure. Logic on-chain, money in the bank account, no custodial intermediary, no manual reconciliation.

USES: EVM Execution · AERLink · AEREDIUM Audit
THE PROCESS

From first conversation to production.

What actually happens when an institution decides to engage. Timelines reflect typical engagement; Participant onboarding is faster, full Validator certification or AERLink Integration is longer.

01
Discovery
Initial briefing with the AEREDIUM technical and compliance leads. Documentation review. Engagement-level fit analysis — Participant, Operator, Validator, or AERLink.
DURATION · 1–3 weeks
02
Architecture review
Joint review of the institution's existing infrastructure, regulatory posture, integration requirements. Technical and legal sign-off. NDA-protected if required.
DURATION · 2–6 weeks
03
Pilot
Live engagement on AEREDIUM testnet with the institution's actual data and integration patterns. Pilot scope is engagement-level appropriate. Joint engineering, daily standups.
DURATION · 4–12 weeks
04
Production
Mainnet engagement. Ongoing technical and compliance support through the AEREDIUM Foundation. Continuous engagement-level monitoring; renegotiation possible.
ONGOING · quarterly reviews
REGULATORY POSTURE

Built for the institutions that regulators actually trust.

AEREDIUM is not a regulatory-arbitrage play. The architectural choices — selective disclosure, attested validators, no anonymous bridge surface — are designed to be defensible under serious regulatory scrutiny. The legal entity structure backs that up.

FOUNDATION
AEREDIUM Foundation Ltd is the Cayman-incorporated entity that governs the protocol roadmap and treasury. Deterministic governance documented in the v3.7 tokenomics — economic rules are protocol-enforced, not Foundation-discretionary.
DIGITAL
AEREDIUM Digital Ltd is the British Virgin Islands operating entity for commercial activities. Separate from the Foundation, with distinct mandates.
LEGAL
Long-running engagement with Jones Day on tokenomics, securities posture, and jurisdictional structuring. The token is structured as a utility token with no managerial-effort representations.
DISCLOSURE
Privacy Mode provides confidentiality at the protocol level and cryptographic capabilities for auditors and regulators. The architecture is designed to make compliance posture demonstrable, not theoretical.
ATTESTATION
Every block is signed by TEE-attested code. The cryptographic record of what code is running is itself publicly verifiable — a property that auditable institutional infrastructure has previously had to take on trust.

Talk to us.

The institutional team responds to direct inquiries within one business day. Pilot programmes are running on testnet now; AERLink integrations are scoped on request.

Schedule a briefing → Download v3.7 PDF See the architecture